|
Zagros
Lithospheric Transect 2000-2001 The framework and the position
Coordinator:
M. Mokhtari
Responsible:
A. Kaviani
Cooperation and Financial Support: IIEES,
LGIT
Introduction
Iran, being located along the active Alpain-Himalian belt, has had a
high potential of seismicity since the collision of the Arabic and Eurasian
plates at the last mountain building process. The knowledge of the mechanisms of
the earthquakes occurring in this region requires the study of the earth
interior structures.
Releasing the energies stored in the earth crust causes the earthquakes, and
these energies in turn, are produced due to the movements of the lithospheric
plates. So, to assess the seismicity of a region, we must investigate the
situation of the lithospheric plates relative to each other. Since the relative
movements of the lithospheric plates take place on the upper part of the earth
mantle, the investigation of these movements should accompany the study of this
part of the mantle.
The knowledge of the crustal structure, in addition to help in recognition
of the earthquake mechanisms, provides the needs of fundamental seismological
studies. This knowledge in detail and with high precision throughout the country
has always been one of the most serious needs of the seismologists.
Objectives
IIEES has conducted many projects in different region of the country in
order to study the crust structure and the upper mantle. Among the project,
recently IIEES in cooperation with the “Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et
Tectonophysique” of University of Joseph Fourier has carried out the project of
“ZAGROSS Transects 2000-2001”. The purpose of the Zagros transect is to
investigate the lithospheric structure of a continent-continent collisional
mountain range at an early stage of its evolution.
The main aim of this project is imaging the lateral variations of the
velocity structure of the crust and upper mantle from the coast of the Persian
Gulf in the Zagros accretionary prism (Bushehr) to the stable block of Central
Iran (north of Yazd). It is expected to better understand the geometry of the
collision between the Arabian and Eurasian plates, including the present
geometry of the subduction.
The data from this transect will be used to investigate the following
objectives: 1) is the oceanic plate still attached to the Arabian continental
plate? 2) Has continental subduction started? 3) If yes, is the entire
lithosphere subducting? 4) Where is the location of the suture between the two
plates and its geometry at depth? And, 5) what is the geometry of the contacts
between the different lithospheric blocks crossed by the transect (Zagros
accretionary prism on the Arabian plate, Sanandaj-Sirjan metamorphic belt,
Central Iran block on the Eurasian plate).
Method of study
This study relies on the recording and processing of local, regional and
teleseismic earthquakes by a profile of densely spaced (approximately 10 km)
seismic stations from Busher to Posht-e-Badam (north of Yazd). Figure 1 shows
the profile and the location of different seismological stations. Following
methods will be used in this investigation:
-
To investigate
tomography of the lithosphere from teleseismic arrival times, a profile of
short period seismic stations with the average spacing of 10 km was
installed. The stations recorded the teleseismic events through 5 month. The
arrival times of these events will be used to invert for the velocity
structure of the lithosphere.
-
To apply
receiver functions method to study the S-wave structure of the earth crust
beneath the stations, we installed broadband to medium-band (100s to 5s)
seismological stations in the different tectonic region along the proposed
profile. The records of teleseismic events will be used to invert, by using
the receiver function method, for the S wave structure of the crust beneath
the stations.

-
Anisotropy of
the upper mantle: the records of teleseismic events (magnitude>5.5) at
distance between 95°-105° containing the SKS-waves, will be used. The amount
of the SKS-wave splitting will provide the evaluation of the amount and
direction of anisotropy in the upper mantle.
-
Dispersion of
surface waves; we deployed 3 mini-networks of broadband seismological
stations, with the average spacing of 50 km in different tectonic settings.
By measuring the dispersion of surface Raleigh and Love waves from
teleseismic and regional events, we may determine the S-wave velocity
structure of the lithosphere.
Field work and
the instrumentation
As this project aimed at many different methods of investigation,
different instruments and station configuration were required. In the following,
a short summary of different equipment and field procedure will be described.
For short period stations we used 3 types of sensors: Le-3D/5s,
L22, L4C. Figure 2 shows the photos of
these sensors and a brief discussion about their characteristics.
The network included 66 stations (at the end of installation phase). 11 of
them were broadband instruments with STS-2 or
CMG-3
sensors (frequency bandwidth: from 100 s to 50 Hz), 8 were medium-band stations
with CMG-40 sensors (bandwidth: 60 s to 50 Hz), and 27
stations had Le3D-5s sensors (natural period: 5s). The remaining 20 stations had
2 Hz 3-component sensors. Figure 3
shows one of the stations. All stations along the profile used almost the same
instrumentation. The list of the stations with the locations and the type of the
sensor in each station is shown in appendix A.
The broadband (BB) stations were not installed along the profile but in 3
mini-networks of about 50-km aperture. Two mini-networks of three BB stations
were located around Kazerun and north of Shiraz; 5 BB stations made up a third
mini-network around Yazd. This setting of BB stations was necessary to provide
accurate measurements of surface-wave phase velocities. All instruments have
been recording continuously for about five months.
Four teams of three persons each (1 driver, 1 Iranian scientist, 1 French
scientist) worked simultaneously in the field to install 66 stations. Two teams
installed 33 stations in the
Southern part of the transect from Busher to Abadeh; their base was in
Shiraz. The two other teams installed 33 stations in the northern part of the
profile from Abadeh to Posht-e-Badam; their base was in Yazd.
The logistics of 4 cars and 12 persons simultaneously in the field was heavy
but proved to be very efficient, since the installation of the 66 stations was
completed within 10 days. We spent the remaining days visiting the stations and
trying to sort out as many technical problems as possible. This way, many
problems were solved very early after installation. We encountered a reasonable
(and usual) number of technical problems with the stations, as well as for
finding adequate station locations.
After installation accomplished, a group of seismologists from both IIEES
and LGIT visited all the stations monthly and made backup of data during the
period of recording. The stations were removed from April 7 to April 17 2001.
Now we have five months of continuously recorded data and an Iranian student
will work on these data as his PHD at the University of Joseph Fourier. This
student will use the methods mentioned above to study the velocity structure of
the earth crust and upper mantle. This investigation will provide a wide variety
of fundamental and applied scientific results. The following table shows the
calendar of the work done by now and the coming visits.
Calendar of fieldwork (tentative for the end of the
experiment)
|
Dates |
Field work |
Participants |
|
September 2000 |
Search for
sites for 11 broadband stations and 8 medium-band stations |
A.
KavianiD. Hatzfeld (2 weeks) |
|
Nov. 6th-Nov. 25th
2000 |
Installation |
Four
teams:-A. Kaviani, A. Paul -D. Brefort, M. Ghassemi - D. Hatzfeld, K. Latifi- A.
Simonin, M. Taghaboni |
|
Dec. 6th- Dec.
19th 2000 |
First visit |
A. Kaviani, G.
Poupinet, M.Taghaboni |
|
Jan. 4th - Jan.
15th 2001 |
Second visit |
A. Kaviani, O.
Coutant |
|
Feb. 12th - Feb
24th 2001 |
Third visit |
A. Kaviani, G.
Herquel, B. Wagner |
|
Apr. 7th- Apr. 13
th 2001 |
Removal of
stations and packing |
Four teams of
Iranian observers:
A. Kaviani, F. Yaminifard, M. Taghaboni, M. Ghasemi |
|
The end of April
2001 |
Sending
stations back to Grenoble |
|
Acknowledgement:
The authors wish to acknowledge the management of the IIEES and LGIT for
providing the opportunity and encouragement to carry out the project. The IIEES
and LGIT financially supported the project. The equipment has been provided by
LGIT and the filed work was conducted jointly. We also appreciate deeply our
colleagues from both the IIEES and LGIT for their co-operation during the
fieldwork. The governor's offices in Shiraz, Yazd and Bushehr kindly helped us
during the fieldwork; we deeply appreciate theirs efforts.
APPENDIX A: station locations
Table 1: Location and equipment of stations
|
Station
|
Latitude
|
Longitude
|
Type of Sensor used
|
Remarks
|
|
F13
|
28.816
|
51.123
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
F12
|
28.773
|
51.224
|
Chinese, L4C (from Jan.)
|
|
|
F11
|
28.963
|
51.290
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
M1
|
29.049
|
51.319
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
F10
|
29.148
|
51.380
|
Chinese
|
|
|
F9
|
29.375
|
51.288
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
A1
|
29.441
|
51.307
|
STS-2
|
|
|
F8
|
29.486
|
51.362
|
Chinese
|
|
|
F7
|
29.586
|
51.433
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
F6
|
29.705
|
51.505
|
Chinese, L4C (from Jan.)
|
|
|
A3
|
29.349
|
51.861
|
STS-2
|
|
|
F5
|
29.844
|
51.559
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
A2
|
29.787
|
51.782
|
STS-2
|
|
|
F4
|
29.643
|
51.902
|
L22
|
|
|
F3
|
29.675
|
52.019
|
Chinese
|
|
|
M2
|
29.713
|
52.230
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
F2
|
29.611
|
52.303
|
Chinese, L4C (from Dec.)
|
|
|
F1
|
29.690
|
52.422
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
P1
|
29.741
|
52.596
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
B1
|
29.841
|
52.578
|
STS-2
|
Station moved in
November
|
|
P2
|
29.860
|
52.751
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
B2
|
30.188
|
52.504
|
STS-2
|
|
|
P3
|
30.024
|
52.864
|
L22
|
|
|
P4
|
30.088
|
52.902
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
B3
|
30.132
|
53.056
|
STS-2
|
|
|
M3
|
30.252
|
53.246
|
CMG-40, L4C (from Dec.)
|
|
|
P5
|
29.192
|
53.143
|
Le3D-5s
|
Station suppressed
in November
|
|
P6
|
30.373
|
53.270
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
P7
|
30.522
|
53.276
|
L22
|
|
|
P8
|
30.562
|
53.174
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
M4
|
30.715
|
53.280
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
P9
|
30.819
|
53.182
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
P10
|
30.913
|
53.011
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
M5
|
31.050
|
52.854
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
S9
|
31.092
|
53.025
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S8
|
31.091
|
53.150
|
Chinese, L4C (from Jan.)
|
|
|
S7
|
31.082
|
53.381
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S10
|
31.207
|
53.426
|
Chinese
|
|
|
S6
|
31.329
|
53.501
|
Chinese, L4C (from Dec.)
|
|
|
S11
|
31.361
|
53.692
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S5
|
31.393
|
53.839
|
Chinese
|
|
|
M6
|
31.583
|
53.811
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
S12
|
31.654
|
53.856
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S4
|
31.691
|
53.945
|
Chinese
|
|
|
S3
|
31.714
|
54.115
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
C1
|
31.782
|
54.128
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S2
|
31.762
|
54.253
|
Chinese
|
|
|
S1
|
31.818
|
54.340
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
S13
|
31.870
|
54.294
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
D1
|
32.040
|
54.506
|
CMG-3
|
|
|
D3
|
32.405
|
54.095
|
CMG-3
|
|
|
C2
|
32.136
|
53.806
|
CMG-3
|
|
|
H3
|
32.157
|
54.475
|
Chinese, L4C (from Jan.)
|
|
|
H4
|
32.261
|
54.358
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
H5
|
32.305
|
54.521
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
H6
|
32.338
|
54.615
|
Chinese, L4C (from Jan.)
|
|
|
D2
|
32.434
|
54.706
|
CMG-3
|
|
|
H7
|
32.453
|
54.908
|
Chinese
|
|
|
H1
|
32.497
|
55.048
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
H8
|
32.498
|
55.192
|
Chinese
|
|
|
M7
|
32.592
|
55.195
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
H9
|
32.650
|
55.334
|
Chinese
|
|
|
H10
|
32.727
|
55.384
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
H12
|
32.795
|
55.428
|
Chinese, L4C (from Dec.)
|
Suppressed in
January
|
|
H11
|
32.866
|
55.493
|
Le3D-5s
|
|
|
M8
|
32.965
|
55.484
|
CMG-40
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
The short
period sensor Le-3D/5s
|
The short
period sensor L22:
|
|
 |
 |
|
The broadband
sensor STS2:
|
The
middle-band sensor CMG 40 T:
|
|

The broadband
sensor CMG3:
|
|
Fig 2, The
seismometers used in the project.
Fig 3, the
station F3, in the southern part of the profile, with the instrumentation and
configuration used at all the stations.
|